Monday, January 15, 2018

Damien Hirst and His Unfortunate, Unbelievable Hoax

Recently, I watched a Netflix "documentary" on the recovery of an ancient shipwreck, "Unbelievable", that had been retrieved by an artist named Damien Hirst.  I watched over several days, knowing nothing about the film or Damien Hirst.  As I watched it I  felt were many disturbing elements.

The story line: a freed 1st-century slave named Cif Amotan II amassed a fortune, built an incredible collection of art and artifacts, and then lost it all when the ship ferrying it—with the Greek name Apistos, or Unbelievable, hence the show’s name: “Treasures from the Wreck of the Unbelievable”—to a private museum sank under the sea. "(

Once they started bringing up the sculptures, a few things seemed out of whack.  I'm not an expert on art history but I've taken enough classes to know what to expect from certain time frames. The work was odd, not fitting into any art history period.  The explanations were vague, mentioning Roman and Egyptian but they didn't look Roman or Egyptian. The "so called" experts didn't seem to know much. The features on the sculptures looked too modern and the placement on the ocean floor was suspect.  As the film went on, it got even more ridiculous.  There was a figure that looked like a transformer and the last straw was Mickey Mouse!  I guess the plan was that people would buy into the film at first and then end up laughing when the Mickey Mouse was "discovered". He said it cost between $50-100 million pounds to make the film and later I read it was $65 million pounds.  I guess that also included production of the artwork.  He made $111 million pounds with his sales.   

The actual exhibit got scathing reviews.   "Damien Hirst’s doubleheader in Venice is undoubtedly one of the worst exhibitions of contemporary art staged in the past decade. It is devoid of ideas, aesthetically bland, and ultimately snooze-inducing—which, one has to concede, is a kind of achievement for a show with work that has taken ten years and untold millions of dollars to create."  (Art News 08/05/2017)

Since this sculpture of Mickey Mouse was part of the supposed loot from the fictitious shipwreck. I have no reasonable explanation of why he spent so much money on the film and the so called hoax.

3 Images from:

Sunday, December 10, 2017

New Drawings December, 2017

There are some who wonder why I draw naked people.  I don't think I can explain, completely. I could just as easily draw an animal but the only animal I have near me is a cat and she won't pose for me.  For years I couldn't draw the human figure because I didn't have models.  Thanks to the wonders of the internet, I can draw from models online.  The human body is endlessly fascinating and since discovering the online models, I've gotten myself back into daily life drawing.



Friday, October 20, 2017

I Draw Naked People

I started art college classes when I was in my teenage years.  One of my classes was called Figure Drawing.  I had no idea what that was.  I assumed it was drawing numbers (figures).  Although, that didn't make any sense.
My first class in figure drawing was a warm, fall day and being a new student, I went to class early. There weren't many people in the room yet but I saw an older man sitting on a stool with a robe on.  As the class filled up with students and instructor, the man took his robe off.  That was my introduction to Figure Drawing.
I had no idea at that time how much a part of my life figure drawing would be.  Most of the paintings I've I've exhibited and sold are landscapes but back in my mind, figure drawing has always been my first love.
The big problem with drawing and painting naked people has always been models.  It's hard to get people to pose.  Over the years, I've sporadically joined groups to do life drawings and classes to have access to models.
In the past 2 years I've been doing drawing from YouTube videos.  Finally, art has come to the internet.  It's not perfect but it's better than nothing.  Because of the videos, I've gotten back into it and am once again working on Naked People.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Love Paintings

Marc Chagall and his wife Bella had what seems to be rare, a true love connection.  They met in 1909 and fell in love at first sight. 

Chagall was of a Lithuanian Jewish family, born in Russia but the Russian revolution created financial problems for the artist. In 1922 the Chagall family move to Pairs.

After moving to Paris, during the1920's and 1930's he achieved fame.  However, this brought attention to the fact that he was Jewish.  As the Nazis gained power in Europe, there was danger for the Chagall family.  His work, particularly, was mocked by the Nazis.
By the time that Chagall realized how close the Nazis were, it was too late.  The only country he safely go to was the US but he didn't have the money to post the bond required for immigration.
Fortunately, Chagall's daughter convinced Alfred Barr of the New York Museum of Modern Art to save her father. Together with Varian Fry, an American journalist, and Hiram Bingham IV, the American Vice-Consul in Marseilles, artists and intellectuals were smuggled out of Europe to the US with forged visas. Chagall was one of over 2,000 who were rescued.
The Chagall family arrived in New York in 1941 but sadly, his wife passed away in 1944. In 1948 he moved back to Côte d'Azur and lived there until his death in 1985. 
After Bella's death, Chagall was heartbroken.  His daughter set him up with a young woman. Virginia, and he quickly went into a love affair with her.  Unfortunately, she was already married. Virginia had a son, David, in 1946 who was Chagall's but did not carry his name.  Finally, she divorced her husband in 1951 but ran off with a totally different man.      
 Again, Chagall was heartbroken and again, his daughter set him up with another good looking young woman!  Very quickly they were married and stayed together until his death in 1985. 

Marc Chagall called Love the primary color of his paintings. He said that the central source of love in his paintings was his wife Bella.   

“I had only to open my window, and blue air, love and flowers entered with her. She seemed to float over my canvases, guiding my art.” — Marc Chagall

Saturday, May 13, 2017

Studio time

It's been hard for me to do much artwork in the past two years but I'm back to painting.  This is the painting I was working on when my time got sucked away.  Maybe it's finished. 

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Art Institute of Chicago

"A Sunday on La Grande Jatte" 1884 by George Seurat 
"Nightlife: by Archibald John Motley Jr. 1943
"Excavation" 1950 by Willem deKooning

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Denver Art Museum

Juan Gris, Nature morte à la bouteille de Bordeaux (Still life with a bottle of Bordeaux), 1919. Oil paint on canvas. Denver Art Museum
Bruce Nauman, Double Poke in the Eye II 1985 Neon mounted on aluminum

John DeAndrea, Linda 1983

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Abstract Drawing

Expressive line and patterns
Using watercolor wash

Abstract line, color from light watercolor (wash)
Line drawing with a splash of color

Sunday, February 7, 2016

St. Louis Art Museum

I spent many years in St. Louis and the art museum was my frequent haunt.  Here are a few of my favorites:
They have redesigned the entry in recent years. There used to be at least one fountain in this area because I remember meeting people at the fountain.

One of favorite rooms with Rodin's sculpture and Chagall on the facing wall

Ernie Trova. One of his "Falling Man" sculptures. Trova used to live in St. Louis and one enterprising art student went through his trash and brought  us an original Trova door which we used as our entry at FPCC years ago.

Amedo Modiligini, the great Italian lover. I believe this is his young mistress.

David Smith
Frank Stella

Alberto Giacometti, the sculptor.  For whatever reason I like his paintings better than his sculptures.